Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Math

Fact: The Village of Stockbridge is facing a "current overall budgeted operational deficit of $173,078.00 and elimination of non-mandatory services." [see Village Meeting Packet for 11/7/2011, page 55]

Fact: At last night's Village Council Meeting YOUR Village council members voted to do the following:
  1. Compensate Clerk Sadwoski $550.00 for performing the duties of the treasurer for three weeks.
  2. Compensate Clerk Sadowski an additional $160.00 per week for taking over the duties of payroll for Village employees. This brings Clerk Sadowski's current salary (yes, salary - he was made an exempt employee) to $800.00 per week.
  3. Voted to change Village Office hours to 8:00 am - 3:00 pm due to a lack of business after 3:00 pm.
  4. Voted to make a mandatory one hour lunch break (un-paid) for all Village employees.
  5. Voted to hire a new part time Treasurer who will work a maximum of 20 hours per week at a pay rate starting at $12.00 per hour, but not to exceed $15.00 per hour.
  6. Voted to add an additional $25.00 fee for water/sewer shut off notices.
  7. Voted to charge a $100.00 transfer fee for Oaklawn cemetery plots.
Show of hands: How many people think this math makes sense?
Show of hands: How may people have had an $8320.00 raise in the past year? Past 5 years?
Show of hands: How many people received said raise after having their hours cut? *
Show of hands: How many people just want to vomit?

* Clerk Sadowski's exempt status requires him to perform 32 hours of work. The new office hours total 35; subtract the mandatory one hour lunch break, to equal 30 hours. Thus, we are paying more money for less hours.
We can't do this math. It makes our head hurt.

27 comments:

  1. So this person is getting paid $26/hr. Not bad considering said person is working in 3 different positions. If you look at the 3 weeks said person was working as treasurer they were only making $8/hr. Seems to me instead of hiring a new part time treasure at $12-$15/hr they should just keep paying Clerk Sadowski an extra $160 a week to perform those duties. They would actually be saving money.

    ReplyDelete
  2. what three jobs? clerk, treasurer, thats two. if you mean he is also running the village, then yeah thats three jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Smokin Hot in StockbridgeNovember 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM

    Don't worry--Clerk Sadowski will last in this job as long as he has in any of them; when the going gets tough, he gets gone! If you don't believe me, Google him & his previous employment.

    Nice that other employees haven't had a raise in years & years, but in times when everyone else made or were begged to make concessions to keep the Village afloat, he gets a raise? Why didn't the previous treasurer get additional funds everytime she kept the Village office running without help?

    And why has the SDDA been coerced into giving up great gobs of $$$ to keep the Village going... but yes, again, back to the now part-time clerk... is getting a raise. Sorry. Just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
  4. FACT: The people who made these decisions live in the village of Stockbridge.
    FACT: They were voted in by the residents of the village of Stockbridge.
    And where do you live?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well the cat lives here. with me. and me and him are both kind of wondering how come our living arrangements are the important thing here. plus he wants a raise now. and a hour cat nip break. dam cat. i'm going to take away his computer. that will teach him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Who is he related to? He's gotta be related to someone around here.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I wanted to check out the budget figures posted in this blog posting, and up until today packets have been available for the public to download. They are now no where to be found, or maybe I'm just missing them? Are they anywhere on the web site for the village? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We checked the Village website, and you are absolutely correct - the packets have vanished. Which we find very interesting, since the clerk is the only one that we know of that has the access and ability to add or delete items from the site.
    Our suggestion to you would be to stop by the Village offices (don't forget the new hours, 8am to 3pm) and ask for a copy.
    The packet in question is 158 pages long.
    The S.C.-H.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I can tell you they were correct as posted here. I have a copy of the packet if you can't locate one. Just so you know I confronted a village coucil member during break and ask if they knew the budget anticipated shortfall for this year was 140,000. She said no. I ask again. She once again said no, we're working on it. During public comment I expressed my shock and disbelief that the new clerk was given such a huge raise and pay for previous additional work. Where is the money coming from folks? Seriously I have talked to two council people since this time and I still don't understand the reasoning for the decision. Maybe others should come forward now instead of waiting for a tax increase and then coming forward in anger.

    ReplyDelete
  10. how could the council, knowing that they were in such bad shape financially vote to give the clerk a raise? if there is no money, where did that money come from?
    it's also interesting to me that while the village offices were open on friday, the clerk was absent. how did he get Veterans Day off?
    what the hell is going on in this Village?
    i am hoping that the vacancy on the council is filled by someone who knows what the hell they are doing. and has balls enough to stand up against this idiocy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. He was getting married.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Married? When he applied for the job, he said he was married.
    Does that mean he lied on his application?
    Or during his interview?
    Or both?

    ReplyDelete
  13. SCH thanks for finding about packet. Please, council, post these and leave them posted. It is silly to have to ask for something that has always been there.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Repeated their vows, you bonehead.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Congratulations Tim, be happy.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hey have not heard from you in a while. Ran out of good things to talk about. Thought maybe someone would talk about Mr.Bryd and Ms.English.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Quite a coincidence that both Ms English and the blog faded off scene at about the same time, no?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Good one Dick Tracy!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Someone loses there job and so I don't get to hear how great Don Byrd is.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Me and the cat are still speechless about the firing of Ms. English.
    So not cool.
    But totally predictable. We just can't figure out what to say about all of that.
    Plus we think that this current council is being run by Byrd channeling Dancer.
    Just not as smart.
    But we do dig Dick Tracy. The cat wants one of those watches. It's not in the budget this year. But Tracy was a super detective, which the cat says you're not, dude.
    So business as usual, as far as me and the feline are concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So you sleep on it and think real hard and maybe you can find something for me. Oh by the way Dan Dancer likes dogs got two of them. See catman he allways trying to get ya!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Me and the cat aren't the paranoid type. We don't think anyone is trying to get us. And even if we did, we probably wouldn't care. Better stuff to do than worry.
    Like nap.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Oh! must be the catnip that you both like.

    ReplyDelete
  24. For the love of God, will someone please shut this stupid thing down. No self respecting Editor would ever post the kind of CRAP that is on this stupid blog. I used to take a look at it from time to time because I thought that for once we might have something positive to represent our town. Obviousely in the end it just a disgruntled persons way to vent their frustrations. For the love of God man... shut this dam thing down.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Then why do you continue to read it, Bonehead??

    ReplyDelete
  26. I will no longer read this. I have to agree with some of the others who have posted on this before. I will read th Sun Times. At least they have the balls to put their name to what they print. I assume one of the anonymous people who poste on here is also the person who created the blog. You call yourself an editor? Pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Oh! no now we are down to 2 people reading this blog.

    ReplyDelete